China Is to Establish Pharmaceutical Patent Linkage and Restoration under US/China Trade Deal

As part of the Phase One US/China trade agreement (Agreement) signed on Jan 15, 2020, China has agreed to establish pharmaceutical patent linkage and restoration, which, once implemented, would give innovative drug companies the ability to: (1) prevent infringing products from obtaining market approvals from China’s drug regulator the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) through patent litigation and (2) obtain extended patent terms to make up for the time spent waiting for NMPA approval. [1]/ As global drug companies continue to develop their own positioning strategies in the world’s second largest market for pharmaceuticals, how to leverage these significant changes would be the key for future growth in China.

 

Regarding patent linkage, specifically, under Article 1.11 of the Agreement, China will “give a cause of action to allow the patent holder, licensee, or holder of marketing approval to seek, prior to the marketing approval of an allegedly infringing product, civil judicial proceedings and expeditious remedies for the resolution of disputes concerning the validity or infringement of an applicable patent.” The langue in the Agreement does not contain any details for the promised patent linkage system. However, an NMPA policy document titled “Policies Regarding the Promotion and Protection of Innovators’ Rights in Drugs and Medical Devices (draft for public comments)” issued in 2017 would shed some light on what the system may look like once implemented. [2]/  According to this 2017 policy document by NMPA, the drug applicant is required to disclose whether the product infringes others’ patents. In the event the applicant decides to challenge the patent, a notification is required to be sent to the patent holders within 20 days of the application submission. If the patent holder views the applicant’s product as an infringing product, a complaint should be filed with the courts within 20 days of receiving the notice from the drug applicant. Patent holders can also inform NMPA of any infringing drug application. NMPA, in turn, can decide whether it should set up a 24-month wait period, during which the drug application cannot be approved pending the resolution of the dispute. However, if no settlement or decision is made after 24 months, NMPA can approve the product.

 

For patent term restoration, under Article 1.12 of the Agreement, China “shall make available an adjustment of the patent term or the term of the patent rights of a patent covering a new product … to compensate the patent owner for unreasonable curtailment of the effective patent term as a result of the marketing approval process related to the first commercial use of that product in China… China may limit such adjustments to no more than five years and may limit the resulting effective patent term to no more than 14 years from the date of marketing approval in China.” Notably, the language is almost identical to the draft amendments to the Chinese Patent Law released in early 2019. [3]/ As proposed in the amended Chinese Patent law, companies would be able to add up to five years to the patent term to make up for the time spent waiting for approval, when the drug product couldn’t be commercialized.  The extended patent term could not go beyond 14 years after the drug’s approval.

 

While both the NMPA policy document and the amended Chinese Patent Law need to be finalized before the system can be implemented, the proposed changes could be significant, and a close read of these two documents is highly recommended to assess the likely impact. Please let us know if we can be of any assistance by contacting any of the authors of this blog or the Hogan Lovells attorney with whom you regularly work.

[1]/         See “Economic and Trade Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Govern of the People’s Republic of China”, available at: https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/phase%20one%20agreement/Economic_And_Trade_Agreement_Between_The_United_States_And_China_Text.pdf.

[2]/         总局关于征求《关于鼓励药品医疗器械创新保护创新者权益的相关政策(征求意见稿)》(2017年第55号).

[3]/         中华人民共和国专利法修正案(草案), available at: https://npcobserver.files.wordpress.com/2019/01/patent-law-draft-amendment.pdf.

China: Survival of the Fittest or Cheapest

My recent article published by FDLI’s Update Magazine:

https://www.fdli.org/2019/05/global-regulatory-focus-china-survival-of-the-fittest-or-cheapest/

 

China drug regulator adds additional 30 new drugs to its “urgently needed” list

On March 28th, China’s National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) published a list of 30 new drugs that are “urgently needed” in China.  To encourage the international pharmaceutical companies to submit their new drug applications to NMPA, the agency will  waive any clinical trials requirement, to the extent the drug sponsors can submit data demonstrating there are no racial or ethnic differences that would affect the efficacy.  This marks the second time the China drug regulator directly calling on the industry to provide better patience access to new treatments that are currently available in U.S., EU, or Japan, but unavailable in China.  NMPA uses the following three criteria in selecting these “urgently needed” new drugs: 1) orphan drugs; 2) for life-threatening diseases and currently no effective treatment; 3) for life-threatening diseases and have substantial clinical advantage.  Significantly, under the NMPA review guideline published in October 2018 for the “urgently needed” new drugs, the target review time for these new drugs is only six months (three months if they are also orphan drugs).  It is reported that since August 2018, when NMPA published the first list of 48 “urgently needed” new drugs, 11 listed drugs have been approved.    

 The public can submit comments to the NMPA within 5 working days (by April 4th), if they disagree with NMPA listing any of the 30 new drugs as “urgently needed” in China.  Query on what basis could the public object to the listing of a new drug as “urgently needed.”  We will continue to monitor the status of any regulatory changes and reforms by NMPA.

Appendix:

 

Second List of Drugs Urgently Needed in China (unofficial translation)

(Source: http://www.cde.org.cn/news.do?method=viewInfoCommon&id=314835)

Serial No. New Drug Manufacturer/Sponsor First approval date

outside of China

(jurisdiction)

1 Biopten Granules 10%,2.5%(sapropterin hydrochloride) Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. 2013/8/20 (Japan)
2 Levemir Insulin Detemir[rDNA origin] Injection NOVO NORDISK INC 2007 for Noonan, 2018 for Prader-Willi  (US)
3 Crysvita (Burosumab) Kyowa Kirin Limited 2018/2/19 (EU)
4 Increlex (Mecasermin [rDNA origin]) Injection Tercica, Inc. 2005/8/30 (US)
5 Aldurazyme (laronidase) BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC. 2003/4/30 (US)
6 Elaprase (Indursulfase) Injection Shire Human Genetic Therapies, Inc. 2006/7/24 (US)
7 Fabrazyme(Agalsidase Beta) Genzyme Europe B.V. 2001/3/8 (EU)
8 Replagal(Agalsidase alfa) Shire Human Genetic Therapies AB 2001/3/8 (EU)
9 Galafold(Migalastat hydrochloride) Amicus Therapeutics UK Ltd 2016/5/25 (EU)
10 Erleada (apalutamide) Janssen Biotech, Inc. 2018/2/14 (US)
11 Lysodren(mitotane) Bristol-Myers Squibb Company 1970/7/8 (US)
12 ALPROLIX [Coagulation Factor IX (Recombinant), Fc Fusion Protein] Bioverativ Therapeutics Inc 2014/3/28 (US)
13 Inavir (laninamivir octanoate hydrate) Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd. 2010/9/10 (Japan)
14 Xofluza(Baloxavir marboxil) Shionogi & Co., Ltd. 2018/2/23 (Japan)
15 Maviret(Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir) AbbVie Deutschland GmbH Co. KG 2017/7/26 (EU)
16 BIKTARVY(bictegravir, emtricitabine, and tenofovir alafenamide) Tablets Gilead Sciences,Inc. 2018/2/7 (US)
17 Tracleer 32 mg dispersible tablets Janssen-Cilag International N V 2009/6/3 (EU)
18 Revatio (Sildenafil Citrate) Pfizer Inc. 2009/11/18 (US)
19 Careload LA (Beraprost sodium) Toray Industries, Inc. 2007/10/19 (Japan)
20 Praluent Alirocumab Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. 2015/7/24 (US)
21 Ruconest (Recombinant human C1-inhibitor) Pharming Group N.V. 2010/10/28 (EU)
22 STELARA (ustekinumab) Injection Janssen Biotech, Inc. 2016/9/23 (US)
23 Lokelma(sodium zirconium cyclosilicate) AstraZeneca      AB 2018/3/22 (EU)
24 Verkazia(ciclosporin) Santen OY 2018/7/6 (EU)
25 Humira (adalimumab) AbbVie Deutschland GmbH Co. KG 2016/6/24 (EU)
26 Lemtrada (Alemtuzumab) Sanofi Belgium 2013/9/12 (EU)
27 Radicava (Edaravone) Mitsubishi Tanabe  Pharma Corporation 2015/6/1 (Japan)
28 Vigadrone(vigabatrin) AUCTA PHARMS 2018/6/21 (US)
29 DUPIXENT Injection Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2017/3/28 (US)
30 Eucrisa (crisaborole) Ointment Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2016/12/14 (US)

 

China Proposes Patent Term Restoration for New Drugs and Higher Damages for Intellectual Property Infringement in its Patent Law

On January 4, China’s National People’s Congress (NPC) released its draft amendments to the Chinese Patent Law, opening a docket for public comments to be submitted by February 3. Significantly, for the first time, the Patent Law would provide up to five years of patent term restoration  for patent term loss due to National Medical Products Administration’s (NMPA, formerly China Food and Drug Administration) regulatory review, but only when a new drug application is concurrently filed both in China and abroad. Under the draft amendments, the total duration for patent rights in China would be 20 years for invention patents and the total effective patent term shall not exceed 14 years after the new drug is launched.

Also under the draft revision, the statutory compensation for patent infringement would be increased from a maximum of 1 million to 5 million RMB Yuan (around 700,000 USD), and 1-5 times punitive damages for willful infringement would be added.

This move comes as China continues developing its “Hatch-Waxman” system to encourage new drug development.  NMPA already published a draft guidance that provided details on how the data exclusivity applies to pre-clinical and clinical data submitted to the agency. The government is expected to finalize rules on data exclusivity protection for new drugs later this year.

If you have any questions about the amendments or wish to submit comments, please contact us.

 

 

China Takes Significant Steps to Consolidate Generic Drug Industry and Lower Prices

With the opportunity for global pharmaceutical companies to gain new access to the Chinese market presenting itself like never before (see our previous blog posts here and here), significant news broke on December 7, 2018, regarding a newly implemented pilot centralized drug procurement program (the “program”) that will have significant ramifications for global pharmaceutical companies.  Specifically, China just announced the reduction of prices for certain off-patent generic drugs by up to 96%.  Under the program, the government will award a contract to the lowest bidder, who will be guaranteed a sale volume of 60-70% of the total market for a year.  The move is aimed at reducing drug prices and encouraging consolidation in the generic drug industry.  The program will be a significant change in how generic drugs are priced and procured in China.

The framework of the program was established by the Central Comprehensively Deepening Reforms Commission (CCDRC), a governing agency that is directly lead by the Politburo of the Communist Party of China.  The CCDRC has entrusted the Shanghai City Government to implement the program, which covers 11 major cities in China, including Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Chongqing, Shenyang, Dalian, Xiamen, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Chengdu, and Xi’an.  Together, according to a Chinese news source (“21st Century Business Herald”), the combined healthcare markets from these 11 cities constitute about 30% of the total Chinese market.  Under the program, pharmaceutical companies had the opportunity to submit bids for 31 generic drugs and the contracts were awarded under the following principles:

  • When there are three or more bidders, the lowest bidder will automatically be awarded the contract.
  • When there are two bidders, the lower bidder will be chosen to further negotiate with the procurement office.  The drug price discount rate will be negotiated using the average discount rates from other generic drugs as a reference.
  • When there is just one bidder, the drug price discount rate will be negotiated using the average discount rates from other generic drugs as a reference.

Source: “4+7 city Centralized Drug Procurement Manual” (4+7 城市药品集中采购文件), available at: http://www.smpaa.cn/gjsdcg/files/file5737.pdf (in Chinese).

After the bidding, which took place on-site in Shanghai, generic drug manufacturers were awarded contracts for 25 generic drugs with guaranteed sale volume in the 11 major cities in China.  The average price dropped 52%, with the highest price reduction being 96%.  We have translated the drugs that were awarded contracts under the program in a list below.  While many global pharmaceutical companies participated in the bidding process, all but two successful bids came from domestic Chinese drug manufacturers.  Additional information on the generic drug manufacturers who had winning bids and the pricing information can be found online at: http://www.smpaa.cn/gjsdcg/files/file5772.pdf.

No. Drug Drug Manufacturer
1 Atorvastatin calcium tablets Beijing Jialin Pharmaceutical
2 Rosuvastatin calcium tablets Zhejiang Jingxin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
3 Clopidogrel hydrogen sulfate tablets Shenzhen Salubris Pharmaceuticals
4 Irbesartan tablets Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
5 Amlodipine besylate tablets Zhejiang Jingxin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
6 Entecavir dispersible tablets Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co. Ltd
7 Escitalopram oxalate tablets Kelun Group
8 Paroxetine hydrochloride tablets Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
9 Olanzapine tablets Jiangsu Hansoh Pharma
10 Cefuroxime axetil tablets Chengdu Brilliant Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
11 Risperidone tablets Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
12 Gefitinib tablets AstraZeneca AB (Kagamiishi Plant, Nipro Pharma Corporation)
13 Fusinopril tablets Sino-American Shanghai Squibb Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
14 Irbesartan hydrochlorothiazide tablets Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
15 Lisinopril tablets Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
16 Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets Chengdu Brilliant Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
17 Losartan potassium tablets Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
18 Enalapril maleate tablets Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group
19 Levetiracetam tablets Zhejiang Jingxin Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd.
20 Imatinib mesylate tablets Jiangsu Hansoh Pharma
21 Montelukast sodium tablets Anbisheng System
22 Montmorillonite powder Simcere Pharmaceutical Group
23 Pemetrexed disodium for injection Sichuan Huiyu Pharmaceutical
24 Flurbiprofen axetil injection Sichuan Huiyu Pharmaceutical
25 Dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Group

 

It is unclear when this program will be rolled out nationwide and how many generic drugs will eventually be covered.  It is important to recognize that under the program, the only determining factor for a successful bid will be the price.  Thus, as global pharmaceutical companies look to do business in China, the implementation of this program will undoubtedly impact strategies on how to commercialize drug products in China and how to best compete in a bidding war with a domestic Chinese drug manufacturer.

It is also notable that this program has caused significant impact in the Chinese financial markets.  Stocks have reacted negatively thus far.  It will be interesting to see whether the concept of “lowest bid wins” affects the public’s view of the quality of their drug products.   On the other hand, it is expected the program will facilitate the generic drug industry’s consolidation and push more Chinese pharmaceutical companies towards innovative drug research and development.  We will be monitoring the program closely, and particularly looking at whether there are any changes made to the program once rolled out nationwide.